IAF Methods

Listing Pros and Cons

by for . Last edit was about 3 years ago
any any

A general method for narrowing down a list of options

0
0
Share
Embed
Use
Edit
View
Delete
DRAFT Pending Declined
Submit for approval
Decline
Approve

Additional info

Goal

Making a decision by listing positive arguments for and negative arguments against the idea

Attachments

You will be able to upload attachments once after you create the method.

Materials

    Instructions

    Before

    Level of Difficulty to Facilitate (to be deleted during review): No specific skills required

    During

    Generate a comprehensive collection of Pros and Cons, by working through the options one by one and generate a realistic set of pros and cons for each (using creativity approaches if it helps). Write each pro or con on a separate card or Post-it, clearly marked "+" (for a pro or positive) and "-" (for a con or negative).
    Collate the collection into an ordered checklist of criteria, with pros and cons stacked separately, any duplicates removed and a single master checklist of all pros and all cons prepared. If time is short an assistant could carry out the first iteration. Focus on the central issue you are working on and order the lists Vital ("make or break"), Important (but not absolutely vital), Marginal (i.e. "would be nice if"). These categories can be sub divided further is necessary.
    Pick out ?

    "Vital" Options, by making a short-list of potentially viable options. If unsure about an item, do not exclude it, yet.
    From the "Vital" short-list, pick out "Important" options, counting the number of "important" pro criteria that are present, and con criteria that are absent. Eliminate all options that score poorly at this stage, to leave a list of feasible, good quality options.
    Repeat with the "Marginal" criteria, condensing the short-list yet further to only options that are feasible, of good quality, and which have useful additional properties.
    This technique is used mainly for screening out clearly weaker options using vital/important/marginal distinction. It does not make finer distinctions within a final short-list. Another technique should be sought to take the short-lists any further.

    After

    Usual or Expected Outcomes: To see all advantages and disadvantages of an idea and come to a decision.

    Background

    Originally "advantages and disadvantages", from Doyle, Michael and Straus, David: How to Make Meetings Work, Berkley Books, 1976, 1993

    Comments (1) ( 3.0  avg / 1 ratings)

    Please Log in or Register for FREE SessionLab account to be able to comment or rate.
    • The basic structure of this method is good. Work out specific details of how you will use this before you start with the group for best results.

      Delete
      about 3 years ago