IAF Methods

Human Spectragram

by for . Last edit was over 3 years ago
20 + 1 - 50

An icebreaker to preface working on a topic that may have a wide diversity of perspectives and opinions

DRAFT Pending Declined
Submit for approval

Additional info


A group face to face exercise to help surface similarities and differences in a group, help people to hear each other's opinions, to get know each other and to do something together that is active.


You will be able to upload attachments once after you create the method.


  • Masking tape



Setting: One long piece of masking tape

Time needed: 20 minutes

Pre-Work Required: In a large open space put a long piece of tape on the floor. It should be long enough for the full group present to spread itself out over. So for larger groups, longer tape or more room around the tape. For smaller groups, it can be as short as 3-5 meters.


• Ask everyone to stand up and gather around the tape. Explain that the tape is a continuum between two answers to questions they will be asked. Then kick off with a simple, fun question to demonstrate the method. (I.e. I love chocolate - go to that far end of the tape, I really really don't like chocolate, go to the other end, then everyone else spread themselves along the tape depending on how much they do/don't like chocolate.)
1. (With a microphone if it is a large group) walk up and down the tape and take a sampling response from people as to why they positioned themselves on the tape the way they did. Usually it is good to sample from both ends and somewhere in the middle. If, upon hearing other people's responses, people want to move, encourage them to do so. This is about meaning making, not about an absolute measure of peoples' opinions.
2. Then move on to your "serious" questions. These will vary based on the context. Start with simpler questions, and move to more complex ones.
3. As you ask questions, encourage people to notice who is where on the line - this helps people find people in common or who have different views that could be useful discussion starters.
4. Depending on time, use between 3- 7 questions. You can tell it is time to quit when people stop moving and are talking to each other more than participating. This means either they are bored, or they have become deeply engaged with each other. And the latter is a good thing!


Potential pitfalls: This method is not appropriate for a group with mixed power levels, because participants immediately see how leadership figures vote and will be prone to simply follow their lead rather than thinking for themselves.

Examples of successes and failures: The success of this exercise depends very much on the quality of questions asked. Special attention should be paid to the questions.


Source: Aspirationtech

Comments (1) ( 4.0  avg / 1 ratings)

Please Log in or Register for FREE SessionLab account to be able to comment or rate.
  • If the questions are open-ended, and a bit broad, this is a great way to begin to understand perspectives that are very different. It may open ensuing dialogue in a powerful way.

    over 3 years ago