IAF Methods

Quick Reviews in 5 minutes

by for . Last edit was about 2 years ago
5 + any
This process is used at the end of a group activity (or in between) in order to review the content or atmosphere in a quick and easy way in just five minutes.
0
2
Share
Embed
Use
Edit
View
Delete
DRAFT Pending Declined
Submit for approval
Decline
Approve

Additional info

Goal

This process is used when there is not much time left, but a review is nevertheless wanted or needed.

Attachments

You will be able to upload attachments once after you create the method.

Materials

  • There are no additional resources needed.

Instructions

Before

Setting: No material is needed or recommended.

Number of participants: any

Types of participants: Any types of participants can be involved in this process.

Time needed: The time needed is only five minutes.

Ideal conditions: There are no special conditions needed.

Pre-Work Required: There is no work that needs to be done beforehand.

Type of Facilitator-Client Relationship: A special Facilitator-Client Relationship is not neccesary.

Facilitator personality fit: The facilitator does not need any particular characteristics, as he/she only needs to supervise the group.

During

Having five minutes for a review allows open questions, but still requires precise answers.

1. Fortunately, unfortunately

In this exercise the group is asked to tell the story of the last exercise. Each person gets to say one sentence, which always has to start with either "Fortunately" or "Unfortunately". Passing can be allowed in order to guarantee a quick continuation of the story, and so as to be able to stick to the time frame.
This exercise is very useful for over- or under-confident groups.

2. Active Listening

The facilitator should ask the participants to gather around in a circle. The participants are requested to show their feelings while you are telling the story of what happened during the last workshop. In order to show their feelings they can use their head or hand height to show ups and downs, or they can move backwards or forward into the circle in order to show their participation at a certain moment. Of course also gestures and facial expressions can help to depict their mood. The facilitator can ask for help with the storytelling if needed, for example to focus better on the participants' reactions.

3. Instant action replay (remote control)

In this exercise the facilitator asks the participants to replay/recreate the whole activity, or only a certain part of it. These replays can be done by one person, a pair or a small group, depending on the situation. The facilitator tells the participants who will stage the moments that he/she has a remote control and will use it to fast forward, rewind, pause, slow down (etc.) the situation. Of course the facilitator can also invent new buttons (e.g. mute, high tones only) or hand the remote control to another participant.

4. Connecting to a previous activity

This activity helps the facilitator to find out how the participants feel using alternating rounds. Again the main focus should be on positive things. The group can answer with short sentences, or even replays, if wished.
Possible questions are:
How was this like/unlike the last activity?
In what ways did you perform better/worse as a team compared to the last activity?
In what ways did your performance in this activity show that you have learned something useful from the last one?

5. Connection to the next activity

For this exercise the facilitator asks the group to prepare short mimes or replays in pairs or sub-groups, or pick an object that represents the answer to the following question: Show me what you want to take from this experience into the next activity.

After

Follow-Up Required: There is no follow-up required.

Usual or Expected Outcomes: The outcome is an overview of people's mood, energy level, experiences, wishes etc..

Potential pitfalls: A problem could occur when the process takes longer than the concise estimated time. This could disturb the schedule.

How success is evaluated: the process is successful when the facilitator knows how the participants feel, and then uses it to plan the next steps, or workshops (e.g. an immediate break).

Background

Source: Roger Greenaway

Comments (1) ( 4.0  avg / 1 ratings)

Please Log in or Register for FREE SessionLab account to be able to comment or rate.
  • Creative ways to do a check on process. There are really 5 methods here, so choose one to use at any one time.

    Delete
    over 3 years ago