Thiagi Group

Blame or Praise

by . Last edit was 5 months ago
#communication #decision making #relationships #explore and understand #thiagi
15 - 20 2 - 30
This exercise is based on Joshua Knobe's experiments on intentional activity and side effects. It explores how a person's intentions affect our decision to assign blame or praise to a behaviour. Participants work with two different versions of the same situation. One version focuses on a harmful side effect of a decision, while the other deals with a helpful side effect. The debriefing discussion explores how we are more willing to blame for harmful side effects than praise for helpful side effects.
3
38
Share
Embed
Use
Edit
View
Delete
DRAFT Pending Declined
Submit for approval
Decline
Approve

Additional info

Goal

Help to realise participants that people tend to consider harmful side effects as intentional and helpful side effects as unintentional.

Attachments

You will be able to upload attachments once after you create the method.

Materials

  • Two versions of the handout, one version for half the participants and the other version for the other half

Instructions

Preparation

Make equal numbers of copies of the two different handouts and arrange them in the same stack with the two versions alternating.

Flow

Distribute the handouts. Don't reveal that there are two different versions.

Give instructions. Tell the participants to work independently. Ask them to read the questions and record their responses on the handout. Wait about 1 minute for them to complete the task.

Check the impact of the different context. Confess that there were two versions of the handout. Read each version and point out the differences.

Poll the Participants. Ask the following questions in your own words:

  • How many of you who had the harm condition handout blamed the chairman for the harmful effects?
  • How many of you who had the help condition handout praised the chairman for the positive effects?

Debriefing

The data will likely indicate that the participants will blame the chairman if his decision had a bad side effect, but they won't praise him if his decision had a good side-effect.

Explore why we are more willing to blame the chairman for the bad side effects than to praise the chairman for the good side-effects.

In your own words ask these types of questions:

  • Do you think it is morally correct to risk the retirement savings of others?
  • Did the intention of the chairman influence your decision to blame or praise?
  • Consider recent events like the financial crises, terrorism, wars, and politics. What effect does our moral values have on our decision to assign blame or praise?
  • Consider your own past decisions to assign blame or praise. What influence did your moral values play on your decisions?

Learning Point

People tend to consider harmful side effects as intentional and helpful side effects as unintentional.

Background

Comments (0) ( 4.0  avg / 1 ratings)

Please Log in or Register for FREE SessionLab account to be able to comment or rate.