IAF Methods

Reaching consensus around several alternatives

by for . Last edit was almost 2 years ago
20 - 60 5 - 30

A polling process for any workshop where a decision between several alternatives is hard to reach

8
9
Share
Embed
Use
Edit
View
Delete
DRAFT Pending Declined
Submit for approval
Decline
Approve

Additional info

Goal

To reach a decision around alternatives in a way that everybody is allowed to show their opinions

Attachments

You will be able to upload attachments once after you create the method.

Materials

  • Paper, markers, flipchart, brown paper or Sticky Wall

Instructions

Before

Ideal conditions: The group can not come to agreement of which alternative to choose

Pre-Work Required:

Alternatives have been proposed and are clarified.

During

When you are in a state of the meeting when it is time to come to conclusion or the participant can't come to an agreement of which alternative is the best:

Put the alternatives up in a table on a brown paper or flipchart. Then ask the individual participants to look at each alternative and grade it with a number between 1-10 (you can choose higher value than 10 if you want them to have greater range of alternatives).
Explain that they should use 10 "if this alternative is the one they choose and will start shouting in joy and this is the ultimate choice, nothing negative with it"
and 1 "if this is a catastrophe, everything will collapse and I will feel really bad about this."

Have each participant write down their answers on a sheet of paper. Do not make them write their answers directly on the table, because you want to allow them to adjust their grading depending on the others grading.

Either collect their answers and write them into the table or ask the participants to write one note for each alternative and put their name on it and add the note to the table.

Summarize the grades on each alternative.

Then you have a prioritized list and know what alternative you should go with!

Feel free to adjust the scale or what the participant should have in consideration when grading each alternative.

After

Usual or Expected Outcomes: Prioritized list and a base to make the final decision

Potential pitfalls: The method is not explained and the participants therefore will not accept the decision

How success is evaluated: Reach a decision and everyone has had the chance to think over every alternative.

Examples of successes and failures: A group could not agree upon a name on a new product. After using this method we quickly reached a common agreement of what the name should be.

Background

Source: Ter's Salmi

History of Development: The Scale is often used in coaching

Recognizable components: Scale

References: Scale

Alternative names: Prioritize from different aspects

Comments (1) ( 3.0  avg / 1 ratings)

Please Log in or Register for FREE SessionLab account to be able to comment or rate.
  • Good for visual polling: not a voting method

    Delete
    about 3 years ago