Benefits of not having a Vision
This is a method to unstick any workshop (a vision workshop or other workshop) where the group is stuck on a step of the process, and unclear about whether the result of the workshop is necessary.
by IAF AdminGoal
- A highly politicized and fairly polarized (yet congenial) group
- A recognized lack of collaboration and partnership
- Votes are split along predictable lines
- Common ground that seems to get built keeps shifting.
Materials
Instructions
Before
Type of Facilitator-Client Relationship: A great deal of trust is needed.
During
Have group members address the following:
i. What are the benefits of not having a vision statement?
ii. Who benefits from not having a vision statement?
iii. How does the organization benefit with/without a vision statement?
iv. What fears are associated with creating a vision statement?
v. What keeps this group together despite this long-standing difficulty in collaboration?
vi. What do we need to do to continue at this point?
After
Follow-Up Required: continue with the process
Usual or Expected Outcomes: Able to move an agreement about the process
Online Tip
This exercise can be done without any major change in the process. Online collaboration boards may be substituted for flipcharts. There could be a separate board for each question or it could all be on one board with space for the participants to add their answers using sticky notes, text boxes, drawing tools or uploaded images.
Attachments
- Unsticking a group.jpg
Background
Source: Jon Jenkins
Derived from: Paula M. Diller on the GRP-FACL Listserve suggested this.
Paula M. Diller <pmariad@SPRYNET.COM> (original email address)
